Attorney General's Chambers

  • increase font size
  • Default font size
  • decrease font size
  • red color
  • default color
  • green color
  • lilac color
  • turquoise color
Bahasa Malaysia
AGC Portal Pautan Segera Kes-kes Terkini Laporan Status & Keputusan Kes-Kes Terkini

Laporan Status & Keputusan Kes-Kes Terkini

Emel Cetak
Jabatan Peguam Negara
 
 
Disediakan oleh : NADIA HANIM BINTI MOHD TAJUDDIN
Diluluskan oleh : MANOJ KURUP

LAPORAN KEPUTUSAN /PROSIDING BICARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA
RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-01(IM)-489-2011
JILL IRELAND BINTI LAWRENCE BILL .....PERAYU
DAN
MENTERI KEMENTERIAN DALAM NEGERI & 1 LAGI ....RESPONDEN
KORUM:
1.     YA Datuk Ramly Hj Ali, HMR
2.      YA Datuk Wahab Patail, HMR
3.    YA Datuk Clement Skinner, HMR
 
 
 
 Peguam Perayu: Lim Heng Seng bersama-samanya Annou Xavier
 
 Peguam Responden:
PKP Arik Sanusi Yeop Johari
 PKP Awang Armadajaya Awg Mahmud
PKP Munahyza Mustafa
PKP Nadia Tajuddin
 
Background of case
The Appellant had filed an application for judicial review against the decision of Ministry of Home Affairs to confiscate and seize publications belonging to the Appellant vide a letter dated 7.7.2008 issued pursuant to Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 are inter alia unconstitutional and in breach of natural justice.
 
Leave for the said judicial review was granted on 4.5.2009. Subsequently, before the substantive hearing of the judicial review, the Appellant filed an interlocutory application[Enc. 18} pursuant to O.53 r.6 RHC for discovery of documents and cross examination of deponents of Respondents’ affidavits. The HC Judge dismissed the said application with costs on 12.7.2011. It is in respect of this that the Appellant is now bringing this appeal against the Respondents. The appeal was set for  hearing on 3.4.2012.
 
 
PROCEEDINGS ON 3 APRIL 2012
 
Respondents raised preliminary objections on 2 points:
·         That the memorandum rayuan of the Appellant does not particularize the error made by the HC Judge on issue of discovery. The memorandum rayuan at paragraph 2-5 appears only to revolve around the HC Judge decision on issue of cross examination.
 
·         That the Appellant had only served an affidavit of one Tan Kong Beng (Executive Sec of Christian Federation of Malaysia) only yesterday 2.4.2012 and adducing of this new evidence does not comply requirements of Rule 7(2) Rules of Court of Appeal and s.69 Courts of Judicature Act.
 
The panel had read submissions and would like the parties to address and submit on these 5 issues:
 
1.    Whether the HC Judge was correct to disallow the cross-examination
2.    Discovery of documents mentioned in the affidavit
3.    Discovery of documents NOT mentioned in the affidavit
4.    Whether the right person to be deponent and affirm the affidavit should be the former Minister (at the time of event took place) or the current Minister
5.    Whether the affidavit by Tan Kong Beng should be admitted as evidence and what weight should be given to the said evidence.
 
DECISION:
Therefore, this matter is adjourned to a new date for parties to prepare and submit on relevant points as specified.
 
Next date: 9 May 2012
 
 
 
Peguam Kanan Persekutuan
Bahagian Perbicaraan Dan Rayuan
 

 



 

Menu Login




Statistik Pelawat

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterHari ini2686
mod_vvisit_counterSemalam37710
mod_vvisit_counterMinggu ini243335
mod_vvisit_counterMinggu lepas341076
mod_vvisit_counterBulan ini1142027
mod_vvisit_counterBulan lepas1268166
mod_vvisit_counterSehingga kini27401075

Kemaskini Terakhir

Khamis, 24 Julai 2014, 10:36

Polls

Sila beri penilaian Portal Web kami
 

Mobile Web

 Portal AGC
Scan QR code for
Mobile access

Pautan Lain

MyGovernment SPKP EPSA
PEMUDAH JKJR Government Transformation Programme
IIM BPH MyIdeas
MSC

SPR

MyEG

DBP